The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling, Dismissed all stakeholders to the United States Royalty Board (CRB) Appeal of decision. before, CRB Identified non-interactive webcasters in 2021 to 2025 During the year shall be paid to non-profit organizations responsible for collecting and distributing music royalty revenue SoundExchange Royalties paid for digital public performances of phonograms.

One thing to note, CRB Rates apply to all non-interactive offers, Programs transmitted over the Internet (Includes recorded music or other audio content) The company of, Including broadcasters that simulcast radio programs over the Internet. The United States Congress established the passage CRB Hearing procedure for determining rates, This allows non-interactive webcasters to use all recorded and publicly released phonograms, Without having to negotiate individually with each copyright owner. towards SoundExchange Pay these "Legal royalty" ; Follow certain rules that limit how often certain recordings can be played, Lest their services become an alternative to buying recordings or listening to them via on-demand services (On-demand services negotiate directly with copyright owners to pay higher royalties) ; parallel-direction SoundExchange Report what they play. SoundExchange Collect royalties, Royalties are distributed based on reports of the content played. Collect royalties 1/2 Recording performer, 1/2 Owned by the copyright owner of the recording, Usually the record company that owns the recording rights.

CRB in 2021 years 6 Make a decision in October, Confirmed that the webcast company is 2021 to 2025 Annual royalties payable (CRB In order to 5 The royalty rate is determined on an annual basis) , The three parties appealed the decision. American Radio and Television Association (NAB) And the National Religious Broadcasting Corporation non-commercial Music Licensing Board (NRB-NMLC) consider, The royalties set for its members shall be less than CRB Set rate. On the other hand, SoundExchange They think the rates should be higher.

NAB The argument is that, Synchronous broadcasting company (simulcaster) Should pay more than Pandora (Pandora) Etc "Custom broadcast" Lower royalties for services. CRB The decision sets a rate for all commercial webcasters, It does not distinguish between custom broadcasting and other services where it is not possible to exert such influence. Customizing radio services simply does not allow listeners to choose specific songs, Or play the same set of songs over and over, Or otherwise unduly influence what is heard, This gives listeners an on-demand experience, You can just pay the legal royalties, Instead of having to negotiate directly with the right holder for the right to play the music. The line between non-interactive custom broadcasting and interactive services is not clearly defined, It was determined by a court case.

In a customized webcast, Users can choose the type of music they will hear, You can even designate favorite artists and include them in your music stream. NAB consider, People who listen to simulcasts cannot influence the songs they will hear, Because the broadcasting company decides all the songs that will be heard, So syndication broadcasters shouldn't have to pay as much for the use of music as custom broadcasters do. NAB Questions have also been raised about raising the minimum annual fee each Internet broadcaster pays for each music stream. On the basis of 2021 years CRB The decision of, Minimum fee from 500 The dollar rose to 1000 U. S. dollar.

NRB-NMLC Contend that, CRB When determining the rates applicable to the webcasters they represent should include SoundExchange With the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) The settlement agreement in the rate as "standard" . CPB For National Public Radio (NPR) And other CPB The supported entity determines the rate. NRB-NMLC consider, On account of NPR The rate is for music played by non-commercial radio operators, These rates should therefore serve as a benchmark for setting rates applicable to non-commercial religious broadcasters. NRB-NMLC consider, Setting non-comparable rates is a form of religious discrimination, violated "Religious Freedom Restoration Act" .

The first 3 An appeal is made by SoundExchange self-proposed, The company believes that, Rate ratio CRB The fixed rate is higher. SoundExchange consider, CRB Ignoring the copyright owner in CRB Evidence of the damage suffered by those forced to license their music under the statutory licensing process administered.

The court rejected all arguments. In any such proceedings, Courts defer to administrative agencies that are seen as experts in their fields. Only in the arbitrary and capricious, Disregarding documented evidence or violating the law, The agency's decision will be overturned. At the trial of the case, The court upheld that respect CRB The decision of. The court examined each argument, It was found that neither party had provided sufficient documented evidence to prove it CRB The decision is clearly inappropriate. The court resolved a number of specific evidentiary and procedural issues before reaching its conclusion.

In theory, Either party may ask all the judges of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D. C. to proceed with this court's decision "All" reexamine. Either party can also appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. In such cases, This further procedure is very rare, But each case presents unique arguments. however, Even if they don't try to extend the case any further, Nor is this the last chance to push for a rate change, For the duration 2 Formulation of the year 2026 to 2030 The process for annual rates will start early next year. (establishment www. broadcastlawblog. com)

TRANSLATORS: Rason group　proofread: Liu Peng



　　disclaimer: This network reprint or compile the original articles are from the network, Does not represent the views of this website or confirm the authenticity of its content. If the source is mislabeled or the copyright of the article is involved, Please contact us, This website will be corrected in due course, delete, thank you.